A visual overview of TimeTravel, a benchmark evaluating LMMs across 10 historical regions and 266 cultures, featuring a radial categorization of civilizations, dynasties, and cultural periods. On the right, sample artifacts from various cultures highlight the dataset's diversity.
Explore our TimeTravel Dataset by selecting an archaeological region to view representative examples from different cultures and historical periods.
Understanding historical and cultural artifacts demands human expertise and advanced computational techniques, yet the process remains complex and time-intensive. While large multimodal models offer promising support, their evaluation and improvement require a standardized benchmark. To address this, we introduce TimeTravel, a benchmark of 10,250 expert-verified samples spanning 266 distinct cultures across 10 major historical regions. Designed for AI-driven analysis of manuscripts, artworks, inscriptions, and archaeological discoveries, TimeTravel provides a structured dataset and robust evaluation framework to assess AI modelsβ capabilities in classification, interpretation, and historical comprehension. By integrating AI with historical research, TimeTravel fosters AI-powered tools for historians, archaeologists, researchers, and cultural tourists to extract valuable insights while ensuring technology contributes meaningfully to historical discovery and cultural heritage preservation. We evaluate contemporary AI models on TimeTravel highlight their strengths and identify areas for improvement. Our goal is to establish AI as a reliable partner in preserving cultural heritage, ensuring that technological advancements contribute meaningfully to historical discovery.
A four-phase pipeline begins with data selection, followed by data cleaning, and then data generation and verification by domain experts. Finally, the verified data is aggregated to construct TimeTravel.
The following tables present a comprehensive evaluation of various multimodal models on the TimeTravel benchmark. The first table compares model performance across multiple metrics, while the second analyzes their ability to describe archaeological artifacts from different civilizations, highlighting variations in accuracy and descriptive depth.
Model | BLEU | METEOR | ROUGE-L | SPICE | BERTScore | LLM-Judge |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPT-4o-0806 | 0.1758π | 0.2439 | 0.1230π | 0.1035π | 0.8349π | 0.3013π |
Gemini-2.0-Flash | 0.1072 | 0.2456 | 0.0884 | 0.0919 | 0.8127 | 0.2630 |
Gemini-1.5-Pro | 0.1067 | 0.2406 | 0.0848 | 0.0901 | 0.8172 | 0.2276 |
GPT-4o-mini-0718 | 0.1369 | 0.2658π | 0.1027 | 0.1001 | 0.8283 | 0.2492 |
Llama-3.2-Vision-Inst | 0.1161 | 0.2072 | 0.1027 | 0.0648 | 0.8111 | 0.1255 |
Qwen-2.5-VL | 0.1155 | 0.2648 | 0.0887 | 0.1002 | 0.8198 | 0.1792 |
Llava-Next | 0.1118 | 0.2340 | 0.0961 | 0.0799 | 0.8246 | 0.1161 |
Model | India | Roman Emp. | China | British Isles | Iran | Iraq | Japan | Cent. America | Greece | Egypt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPT-4o-0806 | 0.2491π | 0.4463π | 0.2491π | 0.1899π | 0.3522π | 0.3545π | 0.2228π | 0.3144π | 0.2757π | 0.3649π |
Gemini-2.0-Flash | 0.1859 | 0.3358 | 0.2059 | 0.1556 | 0.3376 | 0.3071 | 0.2000 | 0.2677 | 0.2582 | 0.3602 |
Gemini-1.5-Pro | 0.1118 | 0.2632 | 0.2139 | 0.1545 | 0.3320 | 0.2587 | 0.1871 | 0.2708 | 0.2088 | 0.2908 |
GPT-4o-mini-0718 | 0.2311 | 0.3612 | 0.2207 | 0.1866 | 0.2991 | 0.2632 | 0.2087 | 0.3195 | 0.2101 | 0.2501 |
Llama-3.2-Vision-Inst | 0.0744 | 0.1450 | 0.1227 | 0.0777 | 0.2000 | 0.1155 | 0.1075 | 0.1553 | 0.1351 | 0.1201 |
Qwen-2.5-VL | 0.0888 | 0.1578 | 0.1192 | 0.1713 | 0.2515 | 0.1576 | 0.1771 | 0.1442 | 0.1442 | 0.2660 |
Llava-Next | 0.0788 | 0.0961 | 0.1455 | 0.1091 | 0.1464 | 0.1194 | 0.1353 | 0.1917 | 0.1111 | 0.0709 |